When
BBS first became popular, consultants, training, operating systems and other
processes to affect it abounded.
Everyone wanted in on the new phase of making employees work safer and thought
they had the right method to make it work and make it effective.
The
problem was that some (if not many) of the programs implemented were clearly
subpar. They didn’t work, they were
costly, and frankly they caused frustration and resentment among management and
the workforce. Many of these programs
were not based on the science of behavior and became negative when a “blame the
worker” mentality developed. This was completely opposite of what the true
meaning and direction of what BBS should have been using positive consequences
to motivate and reward behavior change.
The
entire “positive consequences” piece of BBS may have also worked to help derail
it. Not having a definitive idea of what
“positive consequences” really means, it was left up to the designing companies
to determine what “positive consequence” to use. This has been a problem in the safety
industry for years. Should you use an
award for improved safety performance?
How often, how costly? What award
to use?? Sometimes just a sincere “thank
you” for an improved safety behavior is enough to sustain the behavior. It doesn’t always have to be a physical
award. The further stigma of traditional
safety incentives and erroneous press from OSHA added to the frustration.
The
combination of those not fluent in the science of behavior with others of
varying knowledge of award systems made for designing programs that failed from
the start. These failed programs also
included flaws focusing on at-risk behavior and corrective feedback rather than
a focus on strengthening safe behavior through positive strategies. And of
course those who said they “tried BBS and it didn’t work” were justified to
never do one again. It resulted in the
rise of anti-BBS sentiment in some organizations.
This
is very unfortunate as BBS can be a very rewarding business strategy that
produces excellent results. To reject it
because it was designed poorly is like rejecting a doctor’s prescription
because you didn’t take if correctly.
Both are scientific and BBS has been proven effective but it won’t work
well if it is not implemented properly.
No
one really argues that sustained safety improvement requires changing behavior
of your workers. But it also requires changing
the behavior of executives, managers, supervisors and front line employees alike.
Behavior is how we accomplish all of the things we need to accomplish in
safety. BBS is based on the proven science of behavior—the science that
provides the strategies to motivate all the behaviors we need to create and
sustain a safe workplace. Human error is inevitable and looking to systems like
BBS can minimize the error. Applying
negative consequences will only serve to reduce the behavior you are seeking in
the first place.
For more
information on AwardSafety products or services or other white papers please
contact us at awardsafetyinfo@cox.net